Cross-tool engineering traceability
Follow source-owned relationships, provenance and review after change.
AroTrace integrations
Integrate the engineering tools your teams already use.
AroTrace connects systems across ALM and requirements, architecture and modeling, PLM and product data, development, delivery and planning, and controlled migration.
Each connection is evaluated for the product version, artifacts, relationships, operations, permissions, deployment, and use case. Source systems remain authoritative for their own data.
Direct entry points
Featured integration hubs for established lifecycle platforms.
Each hub brings together platform-specific context, currently documented system pairs, and the questions that must be answered before rollout.
Platform integration hub
Codebeamer integrations
Explore evaluated paths connecting Codebeamer requirements, tests, risks, and changes with adjacent engineering systems.
Explore the Codebeamer hub Platform integration hubPolarion integrations
Explore evaluated paths connecting Polarion requirements, documents, verification context, and baselines with the wider engineering lifecycle.
Explore the Polarion hub Platform integration hubcplace integrations
Connect cplace planning with engineering context: explore integration paths with Codebeamer and Polarion.
Explore the cplace hubThe integration landscape
Engineering integrations across the product lifecycle.
This inventory shows systems in the current public AroTrace integration scope. A product name is not a promise of identical behavior: the available read, write, link, synchronization, embedded, or migration scope is confirmed for the evaluated path.
Integration family
ALM and requirements
Connect requirements, work items, tests, and their relationships across established lifecycle systems.
- Codebeamer®
- Azure DevOps
- Polarion
- Jira
- IBM DOORS Next
- PTC RV&S
Integration family
Architecture and modeling
Relate architecture models and their relationships to requirements, product data, software, and verification.
- Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
- IBM Rhapsody Model Manager
- CATIA Magic
Integration family
PLM and product data
Relate engineering lifecycle work to the product structures and decisions managed in PLM.
- Windchill
- Teamcenter
Integration family
Development, delivery, and planning
Bring development activity, delivery evidence, and program context into the engineering thread without obscuring the source system.
- GitHub
- GitLab™
- Jenkins®
- cplace
Integration family
Migration and extensibility
Evaluate controlled transitions from established repositories and scoped REST-based connections.
- IBM DOORS
- REST-based systems
Looking for a different combination?
Share the systems involved and the engineering context that must remain connected or move between them. We can evaluate a clearly bounded integration path.
How a connection is built
Start with the engineering outcome, not the tool name.
A tool name alone does not describe a working integration. What matters is which artifacts and relationships are involved, whether they need to be read, written, or linked, what the source system permits, and where people review changes.
Connect
Establish the governed connection
Confirm the product, version, deployment, authentication approach, and permissions suitable for the intended use.
Understand
Discover how the system is structured
Identify the projects, artifact types, fields, values, and relationships that carry meaning in the actual configuration.
Align
Map meaning across systems
Relate differing structures to a shared engineering understanding without pretending the underlying records are identical.
Use
Enable the approved behavior
Apply evaluated synchronization, linking, embedded, migration, writeback, or workflow operations for that path.
Synchronize. Link. Orchestrate.
A connection is the foundation. AroTrace turns it into engineering context.
Evaluated integrations can move selected information, preserve relationships across system boundaries, and coordinate approved actions, checks, statuses, reviews, and handoffs.
Synchronize what must move.
Keep selected information aligned across evaluated systems when teams need it locally.
Link what should remain.
Preserve cross-tool relationships while records stay governed by their source systems.
Orchestrate what must happen.
Coordinate configured actions, checks, statuses, reviews, and handoffs as one governed process.
Questions
AroTrace integrations, answered
Answers about system scope, source ownership, connection behavior, migration, and individually evaluated paths.
Which systems does AroTrace integrate with?+
The current public landscape covers ALM and requirements with Codebeamer, Azure DevOps, Polarion, Jira, IBM DOORS Next, and PTC RV&S; architecture and modeling with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, IBM Rhapsody Model Manager, and CATIA Magic; PLM and product data with Windchill and Teamcenter; development, delivery, and planning with GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, and cplace; and migration and extensibility with IBM DOORS and evaluated REST-based paths.
Is the behavior the same for every integration?+
No. Available behavior is evaluated for the product version, operation, permissions, deployment, and use case. A tool name alone does not describe a dependable integration.
Do source systems stay authoritative?+
Yes. AroTrace connects systems rather than replacing them. Each artifact remains governed by the system where it is managed, while configured relationships can be resolved across the boundary.
Can AroTrace connect REST-based systems?+
REST-based systems can be evaluated as a scoped custom integration. Artifacts, operations, permissions, versions, and ownership are defined up front; a REST API alone is not a promise of universal compatibility.
Does AroTrace support migration?+
Controlled migration is a distinct integration path where source, target, mapping, validation, and reconciliation are defined. The landscape includes a named path for established IBM DOORS repositories.
Can AroTrace run in our infrastructure?+
Deployment boundaries are part of each integration-path evaluation. Available models, network boundaries, and responsibilities must be confirmed for the product version and use case; this overview does not make a blanket deployment promise.
Is AroTrace bidirectional and real time?+
Direction and update behavior are integration-specific. A path should be described as one-way, bidirectional, event-driven, or near real time only after that behavior is confirmed for the version, operation, and deployment.
How should AroTrace be compared with general integration platforms?+
Compare more than the number of named connectors. Relevant factors include engineering artifacts and relationships, source ownership, traceability, workflow scope, version evidence, deployment, governance, and the confirmed behavior of each path.
How long does a first integration take?+
Timing depends on the system versions, artifacts, relationships, permissions, and acceptance criteria. A bounded first path should be defined with named owners and representative data before an estimate is made.
Start a conversation
Which systems need to work as one engineering context?
Share the tools, versions, artifacts, relationships, and decisions involved. Together, we can evaluate a clearly bounded first integration path.
Trademark notice: Third-party product names are referenced solely to describe interoperability with AroTrace. No affiliation, sponsorship, certification, endorsement, or approval is implied.PTC, Codebeamer, and Windchill are trademarks or registered trademarks of PTC Inc. or its subsidiaries in the U.S. and other countries. Microsoft and Azure DevOps are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies. GITLAB is a trademark of GitLab Inc. in the United States and other countries and regions. Jenkins® is a registered trademark of LF Charities Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.