Planning
Roadmaps and development progress
Align cplace planning with Codebeamer sprints, stories and backlogs through mapped status updates.
cplace integrations
Connect cplace planning with engineering execution.
AroTrace connects cplace planning with engineering execution. Implemented Codebeamer workflows cover development progress, risk evidence, change and release coordination, and approved document handoff. Explore Polarion as a separately evaluated integration path.
The integration scope is evaluated against your configured cplace solution, connected systems, versions, permissions and workflow. A named system pair is not a promise of identical behavior in every environment.
Choose the engineering system
Explore cplace with Codebeamer or Polarion.
These paths frame the integration discussion. Confirm the required objects, relationships and operations for your environment before rollout.
Requirements and verification
Bring engineering context into planning decisions
Keep planning and engineering responsibilities distinct while defining the information that needs to connect them.
cplace partner
Developed by Arorian, a cplace partner.
AroTrace is developed by Arorian Technologies GmbH. Arorian is part of the cplace partner network and is working on cplace integrations with AroTrace.
Implemented with Codebeamer
From project planning to engineering evidence.
These cplace–Codebeamer use cases are implemented with AroTrace. Their scope is configured for each environment and does not imply the same capabilities for other system pairs.
Risk
Actions and verification evidence
Connect cplace risks and actions with Codebeamer reviews and test evidence.
Change
Changes and release coordination
Coordinate cplace change processes with Codebeamer change requests, defects and release context.
Documents
Approved engineering document handoff
Transfer agreed outputs of finalized, baselined Codebeamer documents into the configured cplace document structure.
The configured cplace data model determines which objects and relationships are relevant. Do not assume a universal project template.
Define the first workflow
Prove one useful connection before expanding.
Bring a representative planning record and its engineering counterpart to the evaluation.
Choose a decision
Name the milestone review, dependency assessment or planning handoff to support.
Map the information
Compare object types, fields, relationships, access and the authoritative system for each flow.
Agree change handling
Specify which changes may update automatically and which require human review, subject to evaluated support.
Test acceptance
Check representative records, missing data and exceptions with the responsible teams before rollout.
Choose the right behavior
Not every planning question needs a copy of engineering data.
Discuss the appropriate AroTrace operating mode for each information flow. Availability is confirmed for the specific integration.
Synchronize
Selected information
Evaluate which fields or records need to be available in both systems and who controls updates.
Link
Engineering relationships
Evaluate how planning records should refer to engineering context that remains in its responsible system.
Orchestrate
Reviews and handoffs
Define the conditions, responsibilities and permitted actions for the cross-system workflow.
Respect the system boundary
Keep planning ownership and engineering authority clear.
A planning update and an engineering approval are different decisions. Define their relationship explicitly.
Ownership
An authoritative source
Specify the responsible system for each object and field rather than declaring one system responsible for everything.
Scope
A bounded first release
Agree the object coverage, direction, permissions and acceptance criteria before expanding to further projects.
Product versions, customer-specific configuration and supported operations remain part of the technical evaluation.
Questions
cplace integration questions, answered.
Start with your actual planning process, not an assumed connector template.
Where should we start with a cplace integration?+
Choose a planning decision that depends on engineering information. Identify the cplace record, the corresponding engineering records and the people responsible for reviewing changes. Then evaluate the required mappings and operations.
Which cplace integration paths can we discuss?+
This hub covers cplace with Codebeamer and Polarion. Each path needs a technical assessment of your configured solution. For another system, share the intended workflow so its feasibility and scope can be assessed separately.
Does engineering data have to be copied into cplace?+
Not every planning need requires a second copy. Evaluate whether the process needs synchronized information, relationships to source records or a coordinated review. The available behavior depends on the assessed integration.
Can you work with our configured cplace solution?+
Your object types, attributes, relationships and permissions are inputs to the assessment. Compatibility is confirmed against that configuration rather than assumed from a standard template.
Is Arorian a cplace partner?+
Yes. Arorian Technologies GmbH, the company developing AroTrace, is a member of the cplace partner network.
What should we bring to an integration discussion?+
Bring the system versions, deployment context, relevant object types, a representative workflow, required direction and the authoritative system for each information flow. Avoid sharing confidential records in an initial website enquiry.
Start with your workflow
Which engineering decision should inform your cplace plan?
Discuss a milestone, dependency or review that crosses the planning and engineering boundary.
Trademark notice: Product names identify the systems discussed. Integration scope is assessed separately for each environment. cplace is a trademark of collaboration Factory AG. Other trademarks belong to their respective owners.